Contemporary Concepts of Transport Planning and Sustainable Urban Mobility

  • Miroslav Đerić Ministry of Communications and Transport of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Edis Softić Faculty of Technical Engineering Bihać, University of Bihać, Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Keywords: Sustainable urban mobility; Transport planning; Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP); Public transport; Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS).

Abstract

Contemporary urban development is characterized by increasing population mobility, rising motorization, and the negative impacts of transport on quality of life and the environment. In response to these challenges, the concept of sustainable urban mobility has been developed, integrating transport and spatial planning, environmental protection, and socio-economic development. The aim of this paper is to analyze contemporary transport planning concepts in the context of sustainable urban mobility, present European experiences, and assess the possibilities for their implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The research applies methods of scientific literature review, analysis of the European Union's strategic documents, and a comparative analysis of best practice examples. Particular attention is devoted to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs), including an analysis of the experiences of Vienna, Copenhagen, Ljubljana, and Barcelona. The results indicate that successful sustainable mobility requires integrated planning, institutional coordination, the development of alternative transport modes, and continuous monitoring of outcomes. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the greatest potential lies in improving public transport, promoting active mobility, implementing intelligent transport systems, and strengthening institutional capacities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alonso-González, M. J., Valdés, A., & Moreno, A. (2020). Mobility as a service: Foundations, challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research Procedia, 47, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.072
[2] Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
[3] Behrendt, F. (2019). Cycling the smart and sustainable city: An analysis of emerging smart mobility technologies and their impact on urban cycling. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2, Article 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100030
[4] Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2021). Cycling through the COVID-19 pandemic to a more sustainable transport future: Evidence from Europe and North America. Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126757
[5] Cavoli, C. (2020). Delivering sustainable urban mobility: European experience and challenges for developing cities. Transport Policy, 98, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.007
[6] Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012
[7] European Commission. (2020). Sustainable and smart mobility strategy: Putting European transport on track for the future. Publications Office of the European Union.
[8] European Commission. (2021). The new EU urban mobility framework. Publications Office of the European Union.
[9] Gallo, M., & Marinelli, M. (2020). Sustainable mobility: Concepts and challenges. Sustainability, 12 (17), Article 6749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176749
[10] Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.002
[11] Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.007
[12] International Transport Forum. (2021). Reversing car dependency: Summary and conclusions. OECD Publishing.
[13] International Transport Forum. (2023). ITF transport outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b6cc9ad5-en
[14] Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
[15] Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2018). Governance of the smart mobility transition. Emerald Publishing.

[16] Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Khreis, H., Cirach, M., Andrés, D., Ballester, J., Bartoll, X., Daher, C., Deluca, A., Echave, C., Milà, C., Pérez, K., Tonne, C., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Changing the urban design of cities for health: The superblock model. Environment International, 134, Article 105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132
[17] Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2015). The end of automobile dependence: How cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Island Press.
[18] Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2012). City cycling. MIT Press.
[19] Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.
[20] Rupprecht Consult. (2019). Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan (2nd ed.). European Commission.
[21] Sdoukopoulos, A., Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., Basbas, S., & Papaioannou, P. (2020). Measuring progress towards sustainable urban mobility. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 720-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.051
[22] Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C., & Moura e Sá, F. (2020). Empirical evidence on sustainable urban mobility planning implementation. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3521. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093521
[23] United Nations. (2019). World urbanization prospects 2018: Highlights. United Nations.
[24] World Health Organization. (2021). Health economic assessment tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling: Methods and user guide. World Health Organization.
Published
2026-10-03
How to Cite
Đerić, M., & Softić, E. (2026). Contemporary Concepts of Transport Planning and Sustainable Urban Mobility. Journal of Road and Traffic Engineering, 72(3), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.31075/PIS.72.03.04